Aculeus makes Starglass, the collaborative research agent that helps teams investigate questions, work with source material and structured data, and carry important findings into source-backed Living Cases.
Starglass does the digging. Aculeus checks the work. You make the call.
Choose how to start
Quick AnswerGet a cited answer now.
Deep ResearchThink it through, then review a Case Plan.
What changed in the county's vendor-selection process?
council-agenda.pdf attached
Explore question
Preview: Question + material
Two entry lanes · one workbench
Bring a question or structured data.
Starglass keeps both paths collaborative. The research lane follows the three Case states below; Data Workbench is a second entry into that same shared workspace, not another Case stage.
Research lane
Question + material
Choose Quick Answer for a cited response, or Deep Research for an editable Case Plan and source-backed Living Case.
Data Workbench
Structured data enters the same Starglass workbench.
Start a shared, workspace-scoped Data Project. Ask Starglass a question or run a deterministic check, then keep the useful finding with the project team.
Inside the project
Ask or check. Ask Starglass about counts, missingness, duplicates, or a comparison, or choose a deterministic check with explicit inputs.
Inspect and collaborate. Inspect the result, then save, share, and comment on a finding inside the shared Data Project.
Raw rows stay private. Starglass sees bounded schema profiles and computed aggregates, not raw rows, filenames, or private object URLs.
You can optionally carry a material finding into an editable Deep Research Case Plan. Nothing auto-starts, and many data findings stay useful without becoming Cases.
The live product path
From question to Living Case.
The homepage follows the same three states you see after sign-in.
Starglass
Aculeus
What are we digging into?
Starglass does the digging. Aculeus checks the work. You make the call.
Choose how to start
Quick AnswerGet a cited answer now.
Deep ResearchThink it through, then review a Case Plan.
What changed in the county's vendor-selection process?
council-agenda.pdf attached
Explore question
Starglass
You
Keep the scoring record separate from the approval timeline.
Starglass · Exploring with you
I've separated those questions in the plan.
Research plan
County vendor-selection process
What I'll look into
Approval steps and recorded votes
Published scoring criteria
Changes between the draft and final record
No research pass has started. Tell Starglass what to change below, or start research from this plan.
Start researchAmend plan in chat
Ask Starglass to refine the Case Plan…Refine plan
Starglass
Source-backed · 2 sources
County procurement review
Example Living Case
The documented approval path is supported by the council agenda[1] and the published scoring rubric[2].
The timing question stays open pending the evaluation notes.
Cited source links
[1] Council agenda[2] Published scoring rubric
Open thread
You
Which question is still open?
Starglass
The evaluation notes are not in the current source set.
Add new research
Research a new angleCheck for updates
Ask a follow-up
Starglass
Aculeus
What are we digging into?
Starglass does the digging. Aculeus checks the work. You make the call.
Choose how to start
Quick AnswerGet a cited answer now.
Deep ResearchThink it through, then review a Case Plan.
What changed in the county's vendor-selection process?
council-agenda.pdf attached
Explore question
Starglass by Aculeus
Bring the first question or dataset.
Use Quick Answer for a cited response. Choose Deep Research when the work should become a Living Case. Or start a shared Data Project to ask, check, and carry a finding into research when it matters.